switzerland and the lie of neutrality

Swiss ‘Bliss’

Let’s Tunnel Into Switzerland ‘Neutrality’

Little Switzerland is in the news again because the longest transportation tunnel in the world has been dug there — again.

Yes, again. And the new tunnel carries the same name as their previous longest tunnel: Gotthard. The money behind that first mammoth project about 130 years ago tells us not only who held power in Switzerland in the 1870s. It also tells us why Switzerland was allowed to be “neutral” as two world wars raged around it. It also tells us how the small but tall Switzerland maintains a relative bliss economically despite neighbors’ wars and financial crises.

Switzerland, the infamous home of numbered bank accounts brimming with criminals’ bounty from around the world, is smack between Germany and Italy and borders France and Austria, too. Yet, it has enjoyed self-proclaimed “neutrality” for about 100 years.

That includes World War 1 and World War 2. Countries were conquering and conquered all around, and yet Switzerland, an international banking center, was untouched.

Imagine that. A vicious German conqueror wielding Europe’s mightiest war machine steamrolls nearby countries. But when the Swiss say, “Oh no, not us, we’re neutral,” the German conqueror replies, “Oh, ok.”

When we read our censored histories, such as what’s available on wikipedia and so many other websites, we’re given two reasons for Switzerland’s success at neutrality. We’re given two reasons why Hitler, for example, didn’t seize the fantastic wealth in Swiss banks along with the valuable chemical and industrial manufacturers.

1. The Swiss people are well-armed in their homes throughout the country.
2. The conquerors and accomplices wanted to keep supply lines open across Switzerland, rather than having them destroyed in war.

Number One: Imagine the Swiss hunkered down with their rifles as the German air force bombs them, a river of tanks flows through mountain passes, and hordes of soldiers follow with hand grenades and bayonets to mop up whoever hasn’t yet succumbed or surrendered.

No match.

Number Two: For just three reasons, there was nothing vital about Switzerland’s supply lines for Germany and Italy. For brevity, let’s focus on World War 2, a war that is more familiar for Americans.

1. Supply lines ran through the bordering country of France, connecting Germany and Italy. France famously fell to Germany without much of a fight.
2. Germany was being supplied and fed by the United States of America. Money from Wall Street. Oil from international Standard Oil. Manufacturing help from Ford. Food from the USA, especially through an operation fronted in Belgium. (Read a Eustace Mullins book for details.)
3. Italy is a peninsula, easily supplied by sea.

In fact, these days, many popular history sites boast documentation about the USA’s funding and supplying of Nazi Germany. True. But those sites are controlled by the international Rothschild crime family and their henchmen, and so those sites never follow the money to the top. Those sites want us to believe that Americans were — and are — the ultimate criminals. But as author Eustace Mullins made very clear, the Rothschilds directed it all.

Tunnel to Neutrality

The real reason Switzerland’s claim of “neutrality” was respected is because the highest power made it so.

What’s the evidence for the Rothschilds being in control of Switzerland, and choosing to make it a sanctuary, since the time of the assassination of President Lincoln in 1865?

• First, we follow the train of money.
• Second, there is no second. There’s no need for a second. But if you like, we’ll pile on some useful facts.

Rails to Rothschild. The new record-setting Gotthard tunnel under the Alps in Switzerland carries the same name as the old tunnel under the Alps. Gotthard.

But let’s not let a train of names confuse us. Let’s let go of “Gotthard” and focus on Escher, because Alfred Escher was the man behind that first mammoth rail tunnel project.

In the latter half of the 1800s, the great international railroad boom chugged across every industrialized nation. Huge projects. When governments paid for them, they borrowed big money from the banks. Otherwise, they “privatized” the projects, which means they gave them to the bankers.

In the USA, there was none bigger than the project to connect the Atlantic with the Pacific, from 1863 to 1869.

The historian Howard Zinn — who skewed everything to his socialist agenda — wrote about the transcontinental railroad. Here’s an excerpt from his book A People’s History of the United States:

The Central Pacific started on the West Coast going east; it spent $200,000 in Washington on bribes to get 9 million acres of free land and $24 million in bonds, and paid $79 million, an overpayment of $36 million, to a construction company which really was its own. The construction was done by three thousand Irish and ten thousand Chinese, over a period of four years, working for one or two dollars a day.

The Union Pacific started in Nebraska going west. It had been given 12 million acres of free land and $27 million in government bonds. It created the Credit Mobilier company and gave them $94 million for construction when the actual cost was $44 million. Shares were sold cheaply to Congressmen to prevent investigation. This was at the suggestion of Massachusetts Congressman Oakes Ames, a shovel manufacturer and director of Credit Mobilier….
(pages 248-9)

That’s good stuff, but the socialist skew is glaring in Zinn’s claim that the Union Pacific “created the Credit Mobilier company.” He wants us to think that an “American” railroad company created Credit Mobilier. Ridiculous.

“Mobilier” is a French word. Credit Mobilier is an investment bank created in Paris, France, by the Periere brothers in 1852 (that’s a decade before the U.S. transcontinental railroad project began, and well before Lincoln became president, and before the U.S. Civil War). Here’s a link to the founding of Credit Mobilier. If you scroll down almost two-thirds of the page to the paragraph beginning with “Across the border in France,” you’ll see that the Rothschilds had “previously” employed the Perieres. This means that the Periere brothers were used as fronts for the Rothschilds (just as were the Warburgs, Schiff, Belmont, Vanderbilt, Rockefellers, etc. Here is a good source.).

Ok. We need to return to Alfred Escher in Switzerland. But first, let’s restate two important facts:

• 1852, the investment bank Credit Mobilier was founded in Paris by frontmen for the Rothschilds (who already controlled French banking).
• 1860s, Credit Mobilier was in the USA, profiteering off the U.S. transcontinental railroad project.

The meteoric rise of Alfred Escher

The original Gotthard Rail Tunnel in Switzerland was constructed from 1872-1882. The world-record-setting mega-project required mega-funding. Alfred Escher, who at that time had near-dictatorial power in Switzerland, made it happen. Two obvious questions:

1. Where did Alfred Escher come from?
2. Where did the massive money come from?

Alfred Escher‘s ancestors had been one of the few ruling families in Bern, Switzerland. Supposedly, his grandfather squandered the family fortune and was bankrupt in 1788. The grandfather fled to Russia. However, the grandfather’s oldest son Henri (Escher’s father), at 18 years old, was sent to the USA supposedly by a “Dutch company” and “made” a fortune.

How did the father of Alfred Escher “make” that fortune? This source claims Henri Escher as “a family friend and associate” of the Hottinger financial force from Zurich, Switzerland, who also flourished in Paris (where a Rothschild brother already reigned). Henri Escher “established the first Hottinger representative office in America.” Henri Escher became friends with the elite of the new USA, including George Washington. In 1814, a millionaire, Henri Escher returned to Switzerland, settling in Zurich, and fathered Alfred.

Alfred Escher enjoyed a meteoric rise in Swiss politics. At the age of 25, Alfred Escher was elected the youngest member of the Grand Council of Zurich. That was 1844. After a brief Swiss civil war (1847), Escher soared to domination of the nation. In 1852, he succeeded in pushing the National Council to privatize the construction of the Swiss railroad network. This was “a momentous decision,” says the website of the Credit Suisse Bank of Zurich. The Credit Suisse Bank was founded by Escher in 1856 following the model of the Credit Mobilier bank of Paris (1852).

Escher founded Credit Suisse Bank “in order to obtain further financing for railroad construction.” (By the way, in the very next year, Escher opened a giant life insurance company, known as Swiss Life. So says the Credit Suisse website.)

Where did the money come from to start Escher’s bank? In Credit Suisse’s startup, “Initial stock was issued with a value of three million francs, but within just three days the total value of subscriptions amounted to 218 million francs.”

Those are massive profits, from 3 million to 218 million in 3 days. Who handled the sale of stock, and who bought controlling shares? Of course, secret.

Various books available through Google show that Escher was well acquainted with the Rothschilds. Supposedly, according to two of the books, Escher avoided the Rothschilds’ demand for control. How did he do that? Escher “avoided” Rothschild control of his bank and railroad mega-project by turning to the Credit Mobilier Bank. Yet, we already know that Rothschild frontmen founded Credit Mobilier. And there you have it. Obviously, Escher did not “avoid” Rothschild control.

(An aside about the books and about Google: Interestingly, the books differ in major aspects and conflict with Credit Suisse’s own numbers, such as the initial stock sale. But they confirm basic facts that support this article. Meanwhile, be aware of two related facts: The books were published by Rothschild-controlled publishers — MacMillan and Routledge. And Google’s initial stock offering was underwritten by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley — of course, Rothschild banks.)

The Credit Suisse Bank publicly praises Escher (here described as a mere “co-founder”) as “the driving force” behind the Gotthard Rail Tunnel project. The bank says: “The Gotthard Railway was largely financed by private and public Italian and German funds, and to a lesser extent Swiss means.”

If we choose to believe the bank’s minimizing of Swiss-Rothschild funding, then the most-massive funding came from two other Rothschild brothers’ banking headquarters: Italy and Germany.

No matter which way they try to divvy it up, mix it up, misdirect us, and confuse us, we’ve got it covered. Rothschild money — which means control — funded Credit Mobilier, thus funded Credit Suisse, thus funded Alfred Escher’s mega project, the original Gotthard Tunnel.

It gets better

So, Escher rose to power in Switzerland through his father’s Dutch-Paris-Rothschild money. He financed a national network of railroads, including the Gotthard railway from Germany through Switzerland to Italy. The system was dubbed the “Escher System.” And his capstone project The Gotthard Tunnel was financed by Rothschild money fronted by Credit Mobilier and Credit Suisse.

Interestingly, Escher’s supreme project was used to break Escher’s near-dictatorial power. The Rothschild-controlled banksters bilked the project, causing massive cost overruns. It was Escher’s baby, and Escher’s reputation sank into the nearly bottomless well of debt inflicted by the banksters. Obviously, Escher was not of Rothschild blood.

When the Gotthard tunnel was fully cut through the mountains, Escher was not invited to the celebration ceremony, 1880. However, he had already taken up residence in gay Paris (financially controlled by the Rothschilds). Two years later, when the tunnel and railway were opened for traffic, it is said that Escher was invited to the railway’s grand opening but reportedly was too sick to travel.

Today, a statue of Escher stands in prominence in front of the Gotthard Station.

Now, how ’bout that neutrality?

Four decades after the Rothschilds owned Switzerland’s near-dictator and its nationwide transportation system, WW1 came along.

And Switzerland said, “Excuse us, we’re neutral.” And nobody invaded.

Later came World War 2. Nobody steamrolled into little Switzerland against its homey riflemen to plunder its vast treasures of wealth.

Explain that. There’s only one way. A higher power controlled Switzerland and wanted it preserved. And so it was.

But was the Rothschilds’ Switzerland really “neutral”? No.

Since the Rothschilds instigated and conducted WW2, for example, Switzerland served as a centrally located headquarters.

The late great Eustace Mullins, in his book The World Order, tells us about Allen Welch Dulles, an American criminal lawyer, banker, and prominent appointee in the U.S. government. His brother, fitting the same description, was John Foster Dulles. JFD later became chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation, the worst criminal “charity” in U.S. history. Mullins reports:

On Jan. 4, 1933, Hitler met with the Dulles brothers at the Cologne home of Baron Kurt von Schroder to guarantee Hitler the funds needed to install him as Chancellor of Germany. The Dulles Bros. were there as legal representatives of Kuhn, Loeb Co., which had extended large short-term credits to Germany, and needed a guarantee of repayment. Allen Dulles was later ensconced in Switzerland by the OSS during World War II. Still later, he became Director of the CIA. He had been a director of J. Henry Schroder Co. for many years.

That’s prior to WW2. Dulles was working for two banks that were fronts for the Rothschilds. He helped fund Adolf Hitler’s rise. During WW2, one of Dulles’ roles was as chief of the European branch of the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS, intelligence, which later morphed into the CIA). With the OSS as his cover, “Dulles ran a collaborating intelligence operation in Switzerland for the Allies.” (quote source: Mullins, Secrets of the Federal Reserve)

That, folks, is working both sides of the war. Working for the Rothschilds. Using Switzerland as a base of operations.

Our U.S. government archives, truly massive, includes corroboration of these facts in indexes (of course, I don’t have the means to visit the archives and attempt to read through the materials). Here’s a link to one of many sources. Search down to find mentions of:

• An entity called Safehaven Switzerland (including Swiss Life, the Escher-founded firm) (Nov. 29, 1945)
• Notes by Allen Dulles at Bern, Switzerland
• Channeling of funds/gold from Switzerland done in cooperation with Colonel Masson of the Swiss Intelligence (June 21, 1946)

Conclusion. Switzerland “neutral”? If “neutral” can mean the location of an alternate headquarters for the instigators and directors of war, then ok, yeah, sure, Switzerland was neutral. But if the word “neutral” is to retain any governmental meaning in our language, then there’s no doubt. Switzerland “neutral”? Absolutely not. Never was. Not then. Not now.

As promised, a pile o’ facts

For a very long time, Switzerland has been used as a safe haven for many Rothschild-controlled-owned fronts. That’s not to say that Switzerland isn’t expendable. The Rothschilds have shown that everything and everyone except direct blood is expendable.

Let’s peruse what’s there in the valleys of safe haven. Here’s one of the sources for what’s bulleted below. My comments are woven in.

• An alternate headquarters of the United Nations, which the Rothschilds set up as a step toward the world having only one government, controlled by them, of course.
• The WHO (World Health Organization), one of many United Nations offspring headquartered in Switzerland.
• The World Economic Forum. Real economics is, first and foremost, control of money.
• The International Olympic Committee. Gee, why not Greece, the birthplace of the Olympics?
• The top international football (soccer) organization: FIFA. Who owns the top teams and controls the worldwide organization? Banksters. Rothschilds.

Money, banks, and mega-corporations:

• The Bank of International Settlements (BIS), which is the central bank of all countries’ central banks (yes, including the USA’s Federal Reserve and the UK’s Bank of England, as examples). ‘Nuff said. Yet, the Rothschilds’ international powerhouses UBS and Credit Suisse are there, too.
• Switzerland has its own currency, the franc, which has long been stable with low inflation. No other significant western country avoids monetary crises, so how do the Swiss do it?
• Switzerland has been a very wealthy country for a very long time. Recent figures, according to the above link: “In 2005 the median household income in Switzerland was an estimated 95,000 CHF, the equivalent of roughly 90,000 USD (as of December 2009) in nominal terms.” Compare that to our bankster-suppressed USA, where a median or maybe average full-time salary is perhaps 35,000 USD.
• The link above (in the Economy section) includes a list of a few of the mega-corporations headquartered there, such as Nestle. The Rothschilds own them.

And this little gem:

• Swiss citizens are prohibited from serving in foreign armies, with the exception of the Swiss Guards of the Vatican.

The criminal Vatican survives all scandals. Why? A higher power is involved. The international church is a power and money tree, which the Rothschilds control. How do you think the Vatican could both help the Nazis and get Nazi-helpers later elevated into popes?

Finally

From tunnel to tunnel, from 1872 to 2010, the Rothschilds have dominated Switzerland, first through money, then through government leaders, and then with the addition of ubiquitous mega-corporations.

Swiss Miss, BIS, the Red Cross, and numbered bank accounts bloated with the plunder of the world’s worst criminals — all of them, and so much more, bask under the banner of neutrality because of and at the pleasure of the male rulers of the German-Jew Rothschilds.

=

Tailings

• Austria, bordering Switzerland, has a similar Rothschild-funded railroad history that’s easier to trace in English.

• Ironically, thanks to Google’s translation service (Use this: http://translate.google.com/#), some interesting German documents were quite useful in research for this article. Here’s an example. Not surprisingly, the translation machine had trouble with grammar, but the gist of the document is easily understandable.

http://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2006-02/artikel-2006-02-der-vaterlandsvater.html

“As soon showed that the financing of railways by Swiss capital at borders and it was already joined with the Frankfurt Rothschilds, the most solvent bankers of Europe, in negotiations, reached an innovation from Paris to Escher decided shortly. Following the example of the Paris Crédit Mobilier, a bank, which caused quite a stir because it harnesses the unused savings of small people and this flow of capital into the financing of industry led, Escher founded with business partners by the Northeastern Railway In 1856 the Swiss Credit Bank in Zurich.”

• Info about Swiss bank accounts, “Nazi” gold, money, etc.

http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/banking/swiss-bank-account2.htm

It’s propaganda, but the basics are interesting. Actually the Swiss banksters stole the wealth of foreigners hit by the war. They’re still holding vast fortunes, waiting for the robbed to die out and descendants to give up.

=party

first understand the real world, then really change it