• THE ANSWER

    We Will
    * Overthrow criminal jewry
    * Abolish interest on loans
    * Restore our republic, justice, safety, and prosperity.

    Our Solution Set:
    We non-jew Americans must

    • 1. unify,
    • 2. win, and
    • 3. govern our country.

    After we unify, we win by:
    a. Voting our Re-FOUNDERS group of honest, open citizens (you and me) into office to replace all national elected leaders.
    b. Voting by Write-In voting (which avoids the fixed electronic-voting system), and then our groups of can-do Americans oversee and ensure honest vote-counts.

    For Americans who can handle the top truth, here's the simple choice that faces us: Plan A, Plan B.

    We The People should be in control of our government and the Federal Reserve Bank, but we're not. Our votes should be counted openly and honestly, but they're not. Government should work for the wealth of the people, not for the people of criminal wealth.

    We have a lying, jew-monopoly Press, not a Free Press. (Don't be afraid of the word "jew". We all have been mis-educated and mis-led in regard to world jewry.)

    We have unequal rights, not Equal Rights under the law.

    We have lost the republic -- and the representative democracy -- guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

    What can we do about it?
    What's the answer?

    The Equal Party USA recognizes that there are only two ways to defeat our totally corrupted government within our lifetimes:

    1. A nonviolent way.

    2. A violent way: rebellion/revolution.

    THE ANSWER

    The Equal Party USA exists to restore a true Constitutional republic in our country by the one legal nonviolent way:

    A one-election replacement of the president, vice president, one-third of Congress's Senate and a majority of the House of Representatives in 2012. And this must be followed by another election in 2014 to achieve a majority in Congress's Senate.

    This can only be accomplished by We The People uniting and Writing-In our votes for our Equal Party USA candidates.

    If we vote-in our majorities, we win.

    Only a united government of the President and Congress can restore our Constitutional republic.

    No single great person, no single great leader, can succeed alone. He or she would be too easily killed.

    Our movement must be as WE, not a he, not a she.

    We grew up in our country believing that a truly great, fair, and just country was achievable, based on our Constitution.

    Our Constitution says we can elect who we want to elect, not who the Democratic Party and Republican Party tell us to elect, and not who the bankers nor broadcasters tell us to elect.

    As Americans, we can elect a new majority of leaders. We can, and we must.

    We The People have the right to re-establish a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

    Our one legal, effective, nonviolent way is to vote, and then ensure our votes are properly counted.

    Let's do the right thing -- the Write Thing -- together in 2012.

    That's The Answer.

    See our Re-Founders page for our plan to success. Come aboard.

Hitler Week: 2: Propaganda. Historic Reversals.

Hitler Week: Part 2

Propaganda

Historic Reversals

Note: Previous articles in my climb to this summit:

Dad in front. Photo by Mom. I guess I was age 7 or 8, and trying to be funny.

My father fought in the snowy mountains in northern Italy in World War 2, though he didn’t do much shooting. He was a radio operator, receiving and conveying reports and orders by Morse Code, which was further encoded, of course. Freezing fingers clicked the apparatus, producing a stream of metallic sound punctuated by occasional bursts of gunfire. His tour ended early when he contracted a full-body rash and had to be evacuated to a hospital.

I know some more but not a lot more than that about my father’s combat experience. He, like so many men of his generation, didn’t talk about it. Isn’t that something? Men who served victoriously in a war sold to them and us as the “greatest” didn’t even want to talk about it. I was a listener. Whenever my parents met with other relatives, I’d sit aside and listen to their adult conversations. I had to split my time, though, as usually the men and women would split themselves into different rooms. I remember only one such war conversation that my father had. It was prompted by my Uncle George Platte, who loved to tell stories. Years later, I asked my father some questions about his own military experiences. I had to lead him. He didn’t want to jog his own memory and continue speaking of what he’d done.

Dad, Mom, and me in 1994.

My father died nine years ago, along with my mother, in a tornado. In recent years, I’ve tried to recall whatever I could about him. I’ve tried to figure out his personality as a man, as an American man, not as the strict, usually unfriendly (but not abusive) father I’d fallen out with. He had a lot of wisdom, but it was shown, never explained. If it couldn’t be conveyed by example, it didn’t get conveyed at all. He wouldn’t or couldn’t explain, which was something I couldn’t accept. But in regard to the war, I think his wisdom included the awareness of how wrong that war was. Nothing “great” about it. Lower- and middle-class 19-year-olds from similar neighborhoods in racially-linked countries trying to kill each other in service of –.

In service of what? In service of whom, really?

George Patton

Despite the flood of propaganda from the governments of victorious “Allies” saying that the soldiers had defended “freedom and democracy” from a “monster,” the great General George Patton quickly figured out otherwise, as I will explain below. Patton came to understand that we’d fought the wrong enemy. I think my father, on a different level than Patton, figured out something like that, too. Killing the wrong people. Hollywood’s endless glorification of the international, governments-sponsored massacres could not snow-under that sickening sense of killing the wrong people. For my father, all that propaganda never quite comforted.

Propaganda

What do you think the definition of “propaganda” is?

Before I looked it up in dictionaries, I thought it meant, basically, lies. My whole education and my learning through the media during my adult lifetime has led me to believe that in the USA we use the word “propaganda” to mean “sneaky lies told by the enemy.” Sure, we could elaborate, but I think that covers it.

Therefore, what I’ve written above — “lies told by the enemy” — is, in fact, a valid definition of “propaganda.” How so? Because how we actually use a word in our “community” must be included in the definition of a word. Dictionaries are first written as a record of what words people use and what the people mean by those words. Later, those dictionaries become a sort of history book, which is good, because we don’t want the meanings of words to evolve, to change, so fast that the current generation can’t understand what the previous generation said and wrote. So, dictionaries have a two-part job: as history books and as current-usage books. Exhibit A: the word “gay.” When I was a kid, the dictionary said “happy” or “glad.” And we used the word. Now, most of us never speak the word unless we refer to its current primary meaning: “homosexual.”

Dictionary definitions

Let’s have a look at definitions of “propaganda” in three different dictionaries.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/propaganda

1. capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions

2. the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person

3. ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one’s cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect

Interesting. That set of definitions doesn’t specify lies at all. That definition is deliberately lame in order to mislead and to confuse. Note: Everybody uses “ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately” to try to persuade other people. But not everybody is lying. The next definition is better — and worse.

http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/propaganda.html

Propaganda

“In general, a message designed to persuade its intended audience to think and behave in a certain manner. Thus advertising is commercial propaganda. In specific, institutionalized and systematic spreading of information and/or disinformation, usually to promote a narrow political or religious viewpoint. Originally, propaganda meant an arm of the Roman Catholic church responsible for ‘de propaganda fidei,’ propagation of the faith. It acquired negative connotations in the 20th century when totalitarian regimes (principally the Nazi Germany) used every means to distort facts and spread total falsehoods.”

Ok. “Disinformation” means lie. Funny, though: That definition includes propaganda within it. The best-informed of our readers already know that Germany under Adolf Hitler told the truth about the plight of their country and their main culture as a result of the infiltration and corruption by conspiring jews. And “nazi” is an unfair term virtually never officially used by Hitler’s government to describe themselves. It’s an insult applied and demonized by criminal-jewry (not “all” jews; just a giant subset of proven, treasonous, conspiring jews in the USA and worldwide).

Everything said and published by Hitler’s Germany is called by our government and media “propaganda.” But I’ve read a lot of it, and I’ve looked at websites full of the posters and slogans (translated into English, of course), and I have watched a few of the full-length films. I have yet to find a lie or deliberate “falsehoods.” No kidding. Yes, I’ve come across some points that strike me as exaggerations, but they would be exaggerations of truth, not lies. Links to a variety of archived materials are near the bottom of this article. But now, let’s look at one more definition so that we cover a good range of dictionaries.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/propaganda

1. information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.

2. the deliberate spreading of such information, rumors, etc.

3. the particular doctrines or principles propagated by an organization or movement.

4. Roman Catholic Church .

a. a committee of cardinals, established in 1622 by Pope Gregory XV, having supervision over foreign missions and the training of priests for these missions.

b. a school (College of Propaganda) established by Pope Urban VIII for the education of priests for foreign missions.

That definition, like the first, does not specify lies. The best that publisher has to offer is “rumors.”

It’s interesting, isn’t it? The actual, widespread meaning of the word as it is used in the media and among our current generation is not directly stated in the dictionaries. Of course, there’s a reason for that.

A-to-Z variety instills A-to-Z confusion. Confusion can be capitalized upon by the un-American owners of most of our capital. They are also the owners of publishers who “deliberately spread widely” their dictionaries.

Let the fun begin

Whatever definition of “propaganda” you choose for your own use, I’d now like you to apply it to the following passage. I copied this engaging text that was put out by a very high level organization. I have not changed it except for two aspects: I replaced a lot of it with elipses (…) to show where I cut parts so the passage wouldn’t be too long. And I removed or replaced the words that would tip you off to who the organization is. I put brackets [ ] around my inserted words. Farther below, of course, I’ll tell you who, and I’ll provide a link to the source so you can see for yourself. But now, the fun part. Here is the actual title followed by big excerpts from the text:

Heart or Reason? What We don’t Want from Our Speakers

An examination of meetings held today suggests that a not insignificant portion of them lack a factor that was once the hallmark of [our group] meeting. To be sure, times have changed: there are no discussions, no heckling, and above all no more opponents who accompany the speaker’s presentations, troubling and forcing him all the more to give his best. There is, however, still something that in many meetings today seems faded, something that previously was considered a peculiarity of [our] meeting, something that is needed still today and in the future: the inner experience and the testimony of an unshakable belief in the Idea.

Indeed, it was just that which distinguished our meetings from those of all other [groups]. We approached the people … not in order to solve problems with our arguments, nor to explain them down to the very last and very smallest detail, but rather we came before [our] people and preached to them our idea.

… Indeed, a speech could even be poor and yet create a success; in such cases the audience had to recognize and feel that there stood a man who lived utterly according to the ideals about which he spoke, a man who was totally and completely inspired by faith in what he said. Just as faith can move mountains, so can faith triumph over resistance and opposition.

In contrast to that, today, in a great number of meetings one can observe speakers who strive quite earnestly yet fail to obtain the expected success. … There are speakers who investigate and carve up their subject with almost scientific exactitude and utterly forget that they are supposed to be preaching a worldview.

To be sure, today people want explanations from the speaker about some of the matters which bother them, and thus the speaker must go into specifics. However, in no case should he forget the greater subject out of which these details come — our worldview. …

[Our best speaker] spoke not to the understanding but to the heart. He spoke out of his heart into the heart of his listener. … The people were won by the man who struck the chord that others had ignored — the feelings, the sentiment or, as one wants to call it, the heart.

By “effective speech” of the sort we expect from [our] speakers we do not mean the kind that sounds like a recording machine spewing its wisdom in a rather mechanically learned pitch. Effective speaking for us is when the speaker suggests that … he creates his words out of his soul, and with the complete power of his faith and trust he brings understanding to his listeners. …

… He must let his soul speak and not try to influence his listeners with intellectual expositions nor cheap superficialities. … We want [our worldview] carried within the people so that [all of us] become alike in our souls.

Obama on video saying "single-payer" health coverage for "everybody." Click link in article for video.

If the Democrats put out that publication, then you’d have to think of President Obama’s “Change” campaign. It was nearly nothing but an idea, and the only change we got was color. (Link to Obama single-payer video.) If the Republicans published it, then we might instantly recall President Bush2′s “Compassionate Conservatism” slogan. It was nearly nothing but an idea, never compassionate for anybody but the wealthy elite and never conservative in regard to the Constitution nor Bush’s supposed Christian beliefs. (Link to Bush video in classroom.)

So, who? Who published that text to help refocus their speakers in order to better reach the majority of their audience? A Church? The jews’ Anti-Defamation League (the infamous ADL)? Naturally, any group would be interested in having their speakers be more effective. And there’s nothing in that text that encourages anybody to lie. So, who?

Here’s the link to the original: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ringler.htm

Bush, after informed by whisper of the 2nd plane strike. Obviously not the commander in chief. Click link in article for video with soundtrack of Bush 9/11 lies.

This is “Hitler Week” on the Equal Party USA website, so you probably guessed right already. It’s from Germany, 1937. It’s important to remember that the original document was translated from German to English, and we don’t know how well. But we do know that any mistakes or judgment calls would not be in Hitler-Germany’s favor.

Also, notice that the “Background” introduction to the text (on the linked page) itself spews propaganda. It says “Germans were tired of the mass meetings.” But the evidence says Germans were bored by some of the speakers, not the meetings, and that many meetings in rural areas needed better preparation. Calvin College, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, has a big section of their website entitled “German Propaganda Archive” (links below). It is a large collection of Hitler’s National Socialist Workers Party publications, speeches, and related materials. Calvin College’s idea is: it’s all propaganda. And in our USA, we read “propaganda” and think “lies.”

But they were not lying

Communism was a threat to the patriotic Germans’ country and main culture. Jews were a threat to the patriotic Germans’ country and main culture. Look at what happened in WW2: Stalin’s Communist USSR was a victorious ally with predatory Capitalism’s duo of the USA and England. The Allies were steered by jews. Jews won.

The top jews created Communism, as I’ve explained before from facts gathered from Eustace Mullins’ books and other sources. We now know that, for practical purposes, this equation represents reality:

The giant criminal subset of world jewry =

Communism =

Socialism (not Germany’s brand of National Socialism) =

zionism =

predatory Capitalism.

(Capitalism? Yes. Our Founding Fathers sought to ensure free Commerce — buying, selling, and trading as individuals see fit. “Capitalism” was created later to subvert free Commerce and put all power in the hands of the wealthy factory-owning bank-owning Capitalists. See this article for other related, vital knowledge.) (And then there’s the difference between a republic and a democracy. Big difference.)

The truth is, the German government from 1933 to 1945 wasn’t lying about the threats to their culture and country nor were they lying about their intentions. Therefore, I say they were not spreading “propaganda.” They were spreading effectively-presented truth.

The German meaning of ‘propaganda’

Germans, themselves, had a very positive meaning for the word “propaganda” in 1930s Germany. The following passage is the last paragraph of this page of advice for the governing party’s speakers who traveled the country. Jews were already twisting the meaning of the word, and Hitler’s government sought to protect the word’s German meaning. (Again, we don’t know how good this translation is.)

To guard the reputation of our propaganda, speakers should always say “enemy agitation” when speaking of enemy attempts to undermine German public morale, not of enemy propaganda. National Socialism has made German propaganda into an instrument whose truthfulness and reliability are respected far beyond the borders of our Reich. Our enemies, on the other hand, use the most despicable methods. Everything said by British plutocracy, Rooseveltian striving for world domination, and Stalinistic lust for world revolution displays Jewish dialectic through lying, twisted facts and the wildest forms of agitation. For example, it is hardly propaganda when enemy leaflets on the Eastern Front assert that the Germans have lost over six million men during the winter battles. That is simply a big lie. Other leaflets state that: “since Corporal Hitler has failed, his generals have to go,” or “the Feuhrer is living a high life and party leaders terrorize the homeland while the people fights at the front.” That can no longer be called propaganda. Such crazy statements are an expression of the wildest, most unrestrained hatred, and betray their Jewish origins. They are not propaganda, but merely spiritual terror and miserable filth. Therefore, the concept of propaganda must always be seen in this way:

“Only Germany and its allies make propaganda. The enemy lies and agitates with crude Jewish methods.”

Source of ‘miserable filth’

So, here we are, 66 years after the end of WW2, and the word “propaganda” now means the opposite of what it meant in Germany when our parents or grandparents were born. The same with “gay.” Americans didn’t protect that happy word, and now it’s lost. Americans didn’t protect the Germans’ meaning of “propaganda,” and it’s lost. Actually, reversed. That kind of quick change comes from people who own the media and the tv and movie industries, where they can lie at will. And the decent people, getting the deceitful filth from supposedly different sources, believe it and adopt it.

Superman is a jew. Superman was created by jews, who gave him and his original parents jewish names. See links in article.

(Superman is a jew. This character has fed us lies our whole lives. Superman was created by jews, who gave him and his original parents jewish names. Even wiki-jew-pedia admits it. Here is a link to the full comic. It was published before Stalin was magically transformed into an Ally. Read a German writer’s lambaste of this comic from 1940.)

The lies came in a steady stream, or rather a flood, from every institution owned or controlled by the giant criminal subset of world jewry. After all, worldwide jewry declared war on Germany in 1933. WW2 didn’t start until 1938. In 1933, Hitler’s Germany had to go into self-defense mode against “worldwide jewry’s” economic and cultural war on Germany. In 1941, jewry in the USA published a book called Germany Must Perish!, the ultimate in hate speech. (Here’s a good link to it, but beware: Mr. Weber doesn’t tell you when his useful introduction ends and the text of the book begins. It’s a deception.)

Watch this video for just 1.5 minutes (link in article) and realize that Dresden was one of many German cities firebombed. True holocausts, directed by jews. Jews define "holocaust" as a burnt sacrifice or burnt offering. The Germans deliberately burned alive no one.

If you do a search and read jews’ excuses about that hate book, Germany Must Perish!, you’ll see that they claim no connection with the author and publisher. Lies. Jew-servant Winston Churchill himself declared that exact quote: “Germany must perish!” (Here’s a link to that, reported by Hitler as told to Hermann Giesling, who became a confidant of Hitler.)

(Link to Dresden Genocide video.)

Yet, it is hateful jewry who has forced treasonous governments to enact “anti-hate-speech laws,” which are nothing more than jew-lie-protection laws. Those laws protect

  • jew lies about Hitler
  • jew lies about a jew holocaust
  • jew lies about Palestinians
  • jew lies about Muslims
  • jew lies about their own “religion” and
  • jew lies about their one-race, supremacist, illegally established country named Israel, as if it’s a “democracy.”

The lies that duped us came from jew-owned media: from big newspapers, to big radio, to tv, and now all the media chains, and their websites, too. The lies came from jew-controlled foundations and educational institutions and their publishers: Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation, Vanderbilt, Guggenheim, Harvard, Yale, and on and on. And the lies came from jew-controlled governments, including the USA since President Woodrow Wilson, Germany after Hitler, Japan after WW2, France probably since the so-called French Revolution of 1794, England since Rothschild supremacy began in about the year 1815. And others.

Treasure

Archives of original and translated documents, speeches, and films from Hitler’s Germany are easy to find. Americans ought to look at original documents and judge for themselves whether the media have fairly described what Hitler and his government actually planned, said, and did, step-by-step. Hitler’s intentions and actions were forced to change over time, of course, because what began as a self-defense action of expulsion against internal criminal-jewry became a defense against all jew-controlled governments in the world.

  • The “German Propaganda Archive” at Calvin College, as already linked above, is a treasure trove — despite the many inappropriate titles and wrongful introductions. Their position is, of course, pro-jew and anti-Hitler. But after you get past their introductory propaganda, the original documents speak for themselves. The archive home page. Notable speeches, translated. Posters . Education. Economics. And more.
  • Feature film: The ambitious Die Rothschilds (The Rothschilds, link is to video; English subtitles) is historical truth about the jew-Rothschild family’s rise to banking supremacy from 1806 to 1815, along with a romance, social intrigue, and wit.
  • Feature film: The great Jud Suss (Jew Seuss, link is to video; English subtitles) is a gripping drama “based on historical fact” from 1733-38. The extravagant and corruptible new duke of Stuttgart is led to ruin by the cunning jew Seuss Oppenheimer and his network. Tragedy involving rape and death finally stir The People to pursue Justice.
  • Documentary: The Eternal Jew (Der Ewige Jude, link is to video; English subtitles). Here, in the narration, is where I suspect some exaggeration. Much footage of real jew ghetto neighborhoods. Map and description of jew origin and spread. Hundreds of faces are shown, including some before and after makeovers. Rothschilds, Warburgs, and others, from Berlin to NYC’s Wall Street. This is valuable for learning to recognize most jews among us and in the media. Excerpts from other controversial films included. Also, utter brutality in judaic ritual slaughtering of animals. Likely unbelievable — until you actually see it.

Also, new research and writings are available that seem to sincerely convey the best information these researchers and writers have found.

  • Carolyn Yeager’s work is especially noteworthy. Yes, I have carefully described her as a wrongful-racist. But her booklet about the infamous camp Auschwitz and her translations of Hermann Giesler’s book (click to the great series of articles) stand as valuable documents. Highly recommended. Here are two nuggets among the many. Hitler in Paris: a builder, not a destroyer. And Valkyrie! — not the jew Tom Cruise version. Another important article by Yeager: Hitler was not a jew.
  • Diaries of Joseph Goebbels, Hitler-Germany’s director of communications. Articles by Thomas Dalton. I first approached this skeptically since bogus diaries have been perpetrated before, most infamously the hoax Diary of Anne Frank. But this Goebbels material rings true. Included, in Part 2, is this from the entry of April 24, 1942: “Some statistics are given to me on the proportion of Jews in American radio, film, and press. The percentage is truly frightening. Jewry controls 100% of the film business, and between 90 and 95% of press and radio. These facts explain the dizzying and spirited warfare of the other side.”
  • Ernst Zundel‘s website. Zundel has been repeatedly arrested, jailed, and otherwise persecuted (including in the USA, Canada, and Germany) simply for spreading information. See many videos, articles, and links to other materials about the “Holocaust” and related issues.

Remember: History is written by the victors. That’s generally true. But throughout the last few centuries, various honest people wrote the truth as best they could, and although their works have been shunned by the victor governments, banned by the victors’ publishers and bookstores, and banned from the victors’ main media, many of those honest works still survive to inform us of vital truth about the past. And some of us are writing the truth as best we can about the present, too.

Patton (left) talking to deaf ears. That's Eisenhower (right).

The great American general George Patton was a victor in WW2. But his overlords turned him into a loser. Why? Patton observed very closely the behavior of the other victors: the Soviet communists (directed by jews), the British (directed by jews), and the jews in general in Poland, Austria, and Germany. Patton was a quick learner, as a master tactician in war must be. He wrote his conclusions in letters to his wife and others, and he expressed his intention to resign from the military so that he would be free to write a book to share the truth about what he found. He clearly intended to share the truth not only about the Soviet and British victors but about the American victors, too. And he was killed.

You don’t get that truth from the jew-produced movies such as Hollywood’s Patton.

Patton, in his much-quoted personal papers (the main source was his wife), said many important things in post-war 1945. (Source article for the following quotes.) Patton quoted French general Alphonse Juin as stating to Patton:

“It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country — and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism.”

Patton in post-war 1945. Screenshot from government video linked below.

Patton agreed. And with growing awareness of the criminal-jew influence, he wrote to his wife:

“If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”

Finally, Patton’s intentions for 1946:

“It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start an all-out offensive . . . .”

Here is an excerpt from a U.S. government video about Patton and his death. Propaganda, jew-style, indeed. Notice who the narrator is. And notice what the government won’t say. Often, the art of criminal propaganda is in what is not said in order to leave a half-truth impression in the listeners and viewers. (For the interested, here’s the long version, 28 minutes.)

That was then. This is now

President “Peace Prize” Obama has a new jobs plan, he has a new bait-and-switch education plan, he had a homeowner-mortgage-help plan, two years ago he had a “shovel-ready” jobs plan, he had a health insurance plan, he promised to “rein-in Wall Street,” he promised to close Guantanamo, he promised a quick withdrawal from Iraq, he promised to return the presidency from Bush’s king-of-treason to a presidency of Constitutional limits. All half-truths or in-your-face lies. All “propaganda,” in its current jewish meaning.

(Let’s hope I don’t have to link to articles proving each point above. Americans have paid at least enough attention during the last three years to know that what I’ve said is true. Right?)

The same for all Congressional leaders and their 500 complicit oath-breakers. They all spew lies. They don’t impeach anybody, but impeaching is their duty when evidence warrants. It’s “the people’s” ultimate power within the three-branch government. But our Congress members are not of, by, and for the people.

The same for Supreme Court “justices,” lying their way to judgments making things called corporations into special citizens with special rights and limited liabilities. And lying their way to stopping a state (Florida) from recounting its own votes (in the year 2000, which was quite unlike the limitless recount for jew Al Franken in Minnesota). And lying their way to letting votes be counted in secret and then reported by private corporate computer systems known to be corrupted and always corruptible. And lying their way to letting the IRS rob Americans of money and possessions in the IRS’s illegal pursuance of unConstitutional laws. Those “justices” are criminals appointed by criminals. Their judgments are laced with propaganda. Laced with lies.

Lost and Founded

Our country was not founded to be a jew-controlled cesspool of lies drowning out honest speech. Our country was not founded to be ruled by the wealthiest criminals living on clouds of splendor, living off our labor, robbing us of our Liberty and Property, and blocking us from success in the Pursuit of Liberty, Property, and Happiness.

Sadly, previous generations of Americans let our country be taken away. But our generation can be the one to take it back. We need 500 leaders. I’m in. Now, we need 499. Who else has the heart to prove what real Americans are made of?

Sign-Up

21 Responses

  1. You are so right about history being written by the victor. My husband has always been interested in military history with an emphasis on Napoleon. Napoleon is demonised in our history books in the UK and without fail is referred to as a ‘dictator’ but he was very much loved by his own people; this is obvious when visiting museum exhibits about him in France. The biggest lie about Napoleon is that he was short. In reality he was 5 feet 7 inches which was quite tall at the time. Pictures of him are always at the end of his life when he was fat and suffered from ill health and yet elite women fell over themselves to ingratiate themselves with him when he was younger. He and Wellesley (Duke of Wellington) shared the same mistresses. And in the background, funding both sides of the conflict between the UK and France were the Rothschilds ;)

    In regard to your first posting on this subject and the comments made therein, I too was unaware that the Nazis never called themselves that. I was also unaware that Patton was killed in a car crash. Knowing what I know now about various assassinations and plane crashes in modern times it was a shock to realise that Patton had clearly been ‘removed’ for his opinions on the exodus from Europe to Palestine of the DP Jews at the end of the war.

    Yesterday I read Norman Finkelstein’s book on the Holocaust Industry and I was repulsed by what I read regarding the money grubbing tactics used by Bronfman et al for reparations and their shake down of Switzerland. Most of the money has apparently been used to fund the holocaust guilt trip museums in the US and yet there are no museums regarding the black slave labour episode. Hypocrisy is an inadequate word to use in these circumstances.

    By the way, you are very brave writing about Hitler. It’s the major taboo to put Hitler in any other light than being a ‘mad dictator’, just like Napoleon.

    • Thank you, Mara.

      I’m happy to have that info about Napoleon. I’ve run across info about him here and there for years, but I’ve never settled on a conclusion about him. Maybe this means I have to make an adjustment because I have said that the Rothschild-jew network has dominated France since the “supposed French Revolution.” But research in that direction would not be a good use of my time at present.

      Patton. I don’t encourage making generals presidents, but Patton would have been American as opposed to Eisenhower being a jewish president.

      Norman Finkelstein. I guess you know that Finkelstein is a jew, and he supports the Holocaust hoax. He’s simply venting acknowledgment that the numbers of supposedly massacred jews are too high. Yes, the “reparations” and “shake down” are still bleeding money from Germans and giving it to supposed “survivors” of the Holocaust, a holocaust that never happened.

      Real holocausts:
      The jew-directed firebombings of mostly women, children, and elderly Germans by England and the USA in Germany:

      1. July 27, 1943, “the British conducted their first major fire-bombing campaign of the war, against Hamburg. Roughly 45,000 people died.”

      2. “On October 23, [1943] the Brits firebombed Kassel—10,000 more civilian deaths.”

      3. “On September 11 [1944] the Allies fire-bombed Darmstadt, killing 12,000.”

      4. “On February 13, [1945] Britain fire-bombs Dresden; as many as 45,000 civilians perish.”

      5. “[February 23, 1945] it does the same to Pforzheim, with another 17,000 fatalities. Allied barbarity knows no bounds.”

      (Source: Translated quotes from Joseph Goebbels’ diary, linked in article above.)

      Taboo. Indeed. Thanks for being the first commenter.
      Note to Americans: Mara is not an American. Where are you, Americans?

  2. I have just posted ‘Hitler and the Bankers’ by Dr. Ingrid Rimland Zundel over at ZioYid. It is clear now that Hitler, NASDAP and Dr Gottfried Feder were entirely correct all along. It is jew usury, the servitude of interest, that is at the the root of the conflict between Capital vs Labour. Once interest on Capital is abolished, economic exchanges flourish because the profit, or bonus, made from the economic exchange is kept by both the worker and the employer, and is not stolen by the jews who subtract the entire bonus via their interest charge on capital.
    Communism is simply a jew con jobs designed to distract us from this basic truth.
    Quoting Mein Kemph:

    “Thralldom* of interest is the real expression for the antagonisms, capital versus labor, blood versus money, creative work versus exploitation.”

    In other words the creative spirit of humans is also unchained once usury is abolished. Usury bonds our economy, it also bonds our creative spirits. We take interest rates for granted now, but usury is actually an alien jewish concept imposed upon us. It is legalized theft of our money and our spirit.
    Of course, once Hitler liberated the German economy from jew usury it boomed. “Hitler had transformed Germany into a socialist paradise and the most powerful and prosperous state in the history of Europe”.
    The jew bankers could take no more, Poland was given a blank cheque to exterminate thousands of Germans and WWII began. After Germany was defeated every surviving German woman and girl was raped, often mutilated, to ensure an end to the Aryan race.
    Everything we have ever learned about Germany and Hitler has been a complete lie. History is a complete lie. Society is a complete lie. Everything is a complete lie. We are in servitude to the jews every second of our lives since the day we were born. We are only kept alive to serve them, born into this slavery we know nothing else.

    Thralldom:
    *One who is intellectually or morally enslaved
    *One, such as a slave or serf, who is held in bondage.

    • Thanks, Robert. As you know, I’ve visited that article and left a comment.

      Well said! “Once interest on Capital is abolished, economic exchanges flourish because the profit, or bonus, made from the economic exchange is kept by both the worker and the employer, and is not stolen by the jews who subtract the entire bonus via their interest charge on capital.”

      Yes. Hitler said that long before he became the leader of Germany.

      There’s no reason why we can’t lend money without interest. An honest and open government should do it, with no interest, no profit. The productivity that results from the lending is reward enough, and it’s a reward shared by everybody.

      If I may offer a caution: “every surviving” German female was raped? We have no need to exaggerate. The exact truth is plenty upon which to condemn most of jewry to firm justice for their directors’ historic and ongoing crimes against humanity and their willingly complicit soldiers throughout our countries.

      Again, note to Americans: Robert is not an American. Americans, where are you?

  3. “Everything we have ever learned about Germany and Hitler has been a complete lie. History is a complete lie. Society is a complete lie. Everything is a complete lie.” Well said Robert. I like the header image on your blog by the way.

    Thank you for taking on this subject in such an objective way James. I was relating elsewhere about how that video about the Olympics and Jesse Owens removed the last lingering doubt I had about the character of Hitler, the regime, and the German people. It’s tremendously helpful to have reliable facts to refer to when discussing this with people, and I do discuss it with everyone I know, and whenever the opportunity presents itself online as well. It has to be done.

    • The first American commenter on this “taboo” article (nod to Mara)!

      Actually, I don’t know for sure if you’re an American, Boxcutter McGee, but your presence is welcome and appreciated.

      • Yes sir! I’m a former Michigander like yourself. I was born in Bay City. I also post as “Blammo”. I know anonymity is a peeve of yours. Circumstances will eventually change.

        I am fortunate in that my friends are all intelligent, open minded people, and they trust my judgement when I relate this kind of information to them. I imagine there was a time when this was much more common.

        As for the issue of inherent (non-cultural) differences between the races (I also followed your exchange with Timster a while ago), I can’t say I concur with your conclusions. My intention is not to invite a debate, I merely wish to state my observations. I’ve spent some time in Vietnam and was treated with the utmost hospitality, respect, and generosity. I was however accompanying an American friend and his Vietnamese wife, and it was in a pretty rural area. Having White men in the village was quite the novelty for everyone, and the majority had never actually seen a White man up-close in person in their lives (aside from my friend, so I was only the second they’d ever seen). I don’t mean to exaggerate, but it was actually such an occasion that people traveled from nearby villages to see us, including a group of older men who had dressed up just to come greet us and shake our hands. A particularly old man approached me with a translation dictionary and wanted to convey to me in private that war was a horror, that he was an innocent peasant, and that he considered he and I to be friends. It was very moving and it struck me speechless.

        I also lived in Cambodia for a few years. While it’s standard practice for example at a market to inflate the price of goods for foreigners some ten-fold or more, I was always able to negotiate prices down to real value without hassle. I was never gouged or cheated by a street vendor or restaurant or anyone. It’s very easy to insist that they be honest with you. Cambodians have a very different disposition than do Vietnamese, and things like openly conversing about you in their native tongue right in front of you are almost unheard of, though they won’t hesitate to have a big laugh at you over something which strikes them funny. To make a blanket generalization, I’d have to say that Khmers are much bolder than Vietnamese, but less malicious. I’ve heard that English teachers are occasionally challenged and harassed by students, but I think this comes down to the sense of entitlement and antisocial behavior exhibited by the wealthy class in the bigger universities. Smaller, less costly schools are quite grateful to have you.

        Again, there is such a chasm between the city and the rural areas, people in the countryside regard the city dwellers as almost of a different nationality.

        What stands out is the division of classes. It is almost uniformly divided along ethnic lines. The wealthy merchant class is almost entirely of Chinese descent. The Han Chinese exhibit the same ethnocentrism, nepotism, and amoral social and business ethics as organized Jewry do. The social stratus seems to be the same everywhere you go in the world, fair-skinned over dark-skinned. Indigenous Khmers are even called “Blacks”. Pure ethnic Khmers in the corrupt power structure are relatively rare.

        Vietnam is obviously infused throughout with Chinese blood and culture. The written language was originally based on Chinese characters. The rural area I visited was inhabited by dark-skinned natives. Perhaps I’ve just inadvertently proven your point about the inherent differences between races, but for whatever reason the Han are distinct, they ovbiously rival the Jew in many respects. I suppose my point is that your ‘soup Jew,’ and perhaps your students and neighbors, may not be representitive of indiginous Vietnamese behavior and mindset.

        I don’t know enough about Chinese history prior to the opium-ravaged Jewish “British” colonial period or the Yiddish “Communist” revolution to know the extent of Jewish influence over the thinking and behavior of the Han. Whereas I see the Jewish tactic is to infiltrate, corrupt, and overthrow, I view the modern Chinese as mindless, soulless automatons devouring everything in their path and breeding like locusts.

        In my limited interactions with Ashkenazim, I have personally known some who further the agenda in some way such as working in fields of social service, and also some who have utterly rejected their upbringing with a sense of revulsion and are exemplary of human compassion, sensitivity, humility and proper ethics.

        It is also worth noting that there was so little support for the zionist project among the majority of European Jews that Germany had to be backed into a corner just in order to get them to violate their human rights and put them into concentration camps. There obviously was no ‘genocide’, but it was not for lack of trying on the part of the Zionist Congress.

        Also worth noting are the 150,000 odd Jews and “half-Jews” serving in the German military, with the regime going so far as to give many of them a sort of honarary Aryan designation. If treachury and disloyalty were in the DNA of the Jew, I don’t see how the racial theory can account for this. I may be wrong on this point, but it is my understanding that the bulk of Jews in the US really only closed ranks and went on the war path after the events surrounding WWII, having been realatively well integrated into Western culture prior to that. Herzl himself is said to have proposed total integration and abandonment of Jewishness prior to undertaking the Zionist project, going to far as to not have his son circumsised. [I have not read the entire book]

        I know you’re careful to distinguish between “all Jews” and the giant subset, and I am not defending Jews as a group, but these are points which must be considered if one is to ponder the notion of a racial theory. It was the prominent Jews in business, media, politics etc. who were bringing the German economy and culture to its knees. I reccently watched a documentary on PBS titled “A Film Unfinished“, described as an unfinished ‘NAZI’ propaganda film of the Warsaw ghetto (by an empire “that knew so well to document its own evil”, an ironic description if ever there was one). Ignoring the contemporary reviews and narration and viewing it through the lens of authentic “propaganda” as you have so well described, what you see is the contrast between rich Jews and impoverished Jews, and how the former regarded the latter with unmitigated contempt and disregard. It was a film originally intended to elicit sympathy from the German people for the common Jew who was left out in the cold by their ravenous, supremicist co-religionists.

        You also have the Mizrahim, who are genetically distinct from European Jews. Prior to the creation of the “Jewish State,” they had survived for centuries in their various Middle Eastern homelands, even demonstrating a remarkable sense of loyalty to their respective nations, and solidarity with their Christian and Muslim compatriots. It was only when the Mossad began a campaign of terror against Middle Eastern Jews in order to drive them to the new “homeland” did relations sour between them and their communities. Once there, they (as well as Shepardim) were, and still are, treated as little better than goyim. Old habits die hard, and they most recently tried to manipulate Tunisian Jews in the same fashion after the fake popular uprising. Genie recently posted an excellent article at Zombie Soup about the history of Libyan Jews which is well worth reading if you haven’t already. It encapsulates the nature of Middle Eastern Jewry in the last century.

        Personally, I don’t agree with the racial theory, and I think it has the potential to alienate people who might otherwise be interested in broaching the Jewish topic. I’m not saying it’s without merit or unworthy of examination at some point, I’m just saying it may be counterproductive at this time.

        There were ‘ordinary’ Jews at one time who were not such strict adherents to the Talmud and found a way to exist in peace among their neighbors, and If you can point out the sheer number of these ordinary Jews who have been victimized in the past by the ambitions of Jewish leadership, it becomes a very potent tool in convincing people and deflecting criticism.

        Of course, all that has changed now, and World Jewry has breathed new life into their hate-filled ‘holy’ doctrine and is united against the gentile world, but understanding this aspect of Jewish history I believe is essential for authentic understanding and wider acceptance of historical revisionism.

        Having said all that, I say in general to hell with Taboo. That’s my 2 cents.

      • Thank you, fellow Michigander. (Some prefer “Michiganian,” but I prefer the gander.)

        Since you said, “My intention is not to invite a debate,” I’ll react very briefly.

        The population of jewry spread out across our country is NOT living peacefully among us. They, and I’ll specify “a very large majority” of them, aquire assets and forever hold them among jewry. It’s a real “cold war,” a silent war. They squeeze nonjews out of ownership, and they block future nonjew creation and ownership of large or valuable assets. Media, jewelry, manufacturing, clothing, food, on and on. Two articles I’ve posted that include info on this are the following:

        http://equalpartyusa.wordpress.com/2011/04/09/jews-in-the-usa-statistics-damned-statistics-and-lies/

        http://equalpartyusa.wordpress.com/2011/07/23/bjerknes-einstein-hitler-and-jews/

      • No argument from me on that James, hence the “World Jewry has breathed new life into their hate-filled ‘holy’ doctrine and is united against the gentile world“. Like I said, I could be wrong about Jews in the US prior to WWII, and there was that whole issue of *cough* human slavery.

        And don’t let my disclaimer stop you from pointing out anything else you feel is inaccurate. ‘Soup Jew’ -made me chuckle btw.

  4. Learning alot on Hitler and the era…wow, I had no idea about Gen. Patton! That was very interesting. I also read Robert’s post on Hitler and the bankers on ZioYid.
    James, love that family photo!
    I’m glad you watched that video of the Irvine 11! The kids would disrupt only when Israel was mentioned. Nicely organized. I seethed to see the indignation of those criminal loving “Americans” in the audience and as you mention, the university official [fat punk] who made an utter fool out of himself in the attempt to display the proper outrage for the criminal Orin. All in all an expo of pure anti Americanism.
    As I mentioned in a comment to an earlier post on the Irvine 11 on my blog, these kids have Arab American fathers who could very easily (even likely) suffer for their children sin of insulting a Zionist high official. Remember, Arabs are the new blacks in America. Zionists are now open Nazis, they are out of the closet…they don’t hold back because they have assumed full power of this nation and they know the script because personally I think they wrote it! If these Arab Americans have relatives in Palestine they could also suffer consequences and most likely will unless they are in Jordan. Then possibly not because it serves Israel interests to feign respect to the king and the faux sovereignty of Jordan. Arial Sharon was quoted saying: “All I have to do is make a speech and the king of Jordan will be packing”. So there you go. Palestinians in Palestine, however, have no rights, no protectors and no buffers. Their blood is free and cheap for the beast. Whatever happens to the Palestinians…everyone must remember that the Jews love us no more than that. They get to everyone the same eventually. I can’t emphasize those last 2 lines enough.

    • Thank you, American Genie!

      But, dear Genie, “Zionists are now open Nazis” ? Why use that term?

      Jerry Seinfeld had the famous episode about the “Soup Nazi.” That’s the jews’ way of keeping the lie alive, in every way, every form of media, whether funny or serious. It ought to have been the “Soup Jew.”

      I’m using that idea as a private joke here in VietNam. Near my house, a woman sells a kind of pork-and-vegetable stew called “Lagu.” When I ate inside her tiny restaurant, I got a reasonable serving of meat and vegetables. But I couldn’t stand eating in there. One reason: A little dog was allowed atop the tables! So, after eating there a few times, I always bought take-out. When I’d get home, too many times I was given a bone with nearly no meat, and once there were no vegetables — which was because it was the last in the pot. But she charged me the full price. I will never buy from there again. She is the Lagu Jew.

      I guess this is a good time to say that I think I’ve fully awakened to the race-culture connection. No, it’s not applicable to each and every difference among races and cultures. And I still hold to the principles expressed in my recent article on Yeager, “A Supremacist….” But what I now deeply know about the culture here (where it’s nearly all one kind of people) and what my research about jews has taught me, proves the race-culture connection with certain behaviors. This info is trying to burst out of me! But I still think I should wait until I’m no longer a guest here. We’ll see. I’ll say this though: From the culture of my youth in most of Michigan to the culture here is a GIANT leap. (A Jesse Owens long jump, as in the vid.) From this culture here to jew culture is just two steps. (1. Patient, united adherence to plans. 2. Everlasting, overt and covert, racist-supremacist viciousness.) Jewry has a lock on that combo.

      Finally, I’d like to return everyone’s thoughts to the subject at hand and your final three sentences:

      “Whatever happens to the Palestinians…everyone must remember that the Jews love us no more than that. They get to everyone the same eventually. I can’t emphasize those last 2 lines enough.”

      • I saw my habitual mistake when I used the term “Zionist” when I re read although I get get “Jew” in there afterwards (came natural) …I figured I would leave it original and take the correction for it. What the heck.

      • I meant, why use the term “nazi”?

        “Zionist,” as you know, is a too-narrow term.

        But “Nazi” is 99% wrongful and an insult to the most admirable, national, anti-criminal-jewry effort in a century.

      • meant, why use the term “nazi”?

        oh. Right!

  5. The only thing I need to clarify is that every woman and girl in the Eastern part of Germany, that part of Germany being ‘liberated’ by the Soviets, WAS systematically raped. These were direct orders from Stalin. It happened in Allied ‘liberated’ Western Germany as well but possibly not to the same extent. But definitely, EVERY German girl and woman in the parts of Germany being invaded by the Soviets WAS raped. After decades of silence there seems to be quite a lot of info. on this horrific subject. Here is just one link I found on an initial search: http://pictureshistory.blogspot.com/2009/10/rape-of-german-women-after-germany-lost.html
    @Boxcutter McGee, the header image on my site was taken from Holywar.org http://holywar.org/PROPAGA2.htm This site has hundreds of useful Propaganda images for folk to enjoy and share!

    • Thanks, Robert.

      CAUTION to all: When I had both of those links open and after I read the rape story (which I realized I’d seen before), I clicked to the tab holding the holywar.org page, and my Firefox browser froze, and my computer froze. In the end, I had to force a shutdown, restart twice, and delete all cookies etc. before Firefox would act normally again. Also, I scanned my Program Files folder for viruses and found none.

      I have to suspect the holywar.org as being the problem.

      Please, if anybody else has a good or bad experience associated with those links, please let us know.

  6. Although after saying that, it seems that German women in Allied occupied Western Germany were forced to ‘cooperate’ to stay alive. Maybe a piece of bread or a chocolate bar was given for the sexual ‘exchange’. I don’t believe it would be too far off the mark to say that every German woman was effectively, systematically raped by the occupying forces after the war.

    Regardless of this, we cannot for a second forget that it was the jew, or more specifically, the Rothschild jew who is 100% responsible for the absolute calamity that was the second world war. This war, so brutal, so completely unnecessary, so deliberately conspired by world jewry to murder millions of Christians and to further their goals of global supremacy was just the continuum of many more to follow. Palestine, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya all jew wars, fought for the jew banker.

    Will Christians ever learn? Have jews not the slightest hint of collective quilt for the suffering they have caused? What’s in store for us next in a society were we are not even allowed to say the jew word without being excommunicated? God forbid, Ron Paul might just accidentally slip out the jew word when critiquing the FED’s recent performance! God forbid someone other than the EqualParty might just actually speak the Truth!!

  7. Hi James, I was aware while I was reading Finkelstein just where he was coming from and I took that into consideration but I was still interested in the reparations debacle. In fact, all the talk of the holocaust by Finkelstein prompted me to go looking for an alternative explanation for this event, which I have never truly been able to understand through the ‘official’ version. I have had a look at some of the information at Zombie Soup and from there I ended up reading three books over the last few days written by Carlo Mattogno regarding Auschwitz, Treblinka and Belzec. All of the time I have spent has been well worth it though :)

    Re WW2 – yep England bombed Germany way before they retaliated later with the blitz on London.

  8. I think the HolyWar link is all right. It is just the volume of data (hundreds of pics) that may tend to lock or slow down a slower pc or internet connection. This link might be better: http://holywar.org/, then click on the propaganda language might be better, (or then again avoid it)!. I don’t know what the broadband speed is like in Vietnam, but I understand why you might have had problems, sorri!

  9. Great comment, Blammo, lots of interesting stuff!
    “the majority of European Jews that Germany had to be backed into a corner just in order to get them to violate their human rights and put them into concentration camps”

    Funny how the once anti Zionists terrorized and defrauded into Palestine seem to have gotten with the Israeli program and thier offspring are dehumanized monsters. It’s a fascinating thing. And horrifying, of course.

  10. Did I use dehumanize correctly? Maybe not… I mean In the sense that the Jews born in “Israel” have been created since birth to be what they are. Not even Americans who tend to forget they are living in occupied Native American country would tolerate the murder of the natives right before their eyes. We are not outright INSTRUCTED to go to their homes and take their stuff because, by God, it’s ours and don’t forget to shoot the kids on our way out or else they will hunt us down later because they are terrorists.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.